Previous posts...
  • A tale of two cultures (2 comments)
  • Banking Bonuses (1 comments)
  • HR in a downturn (3 comments)
  • Give me the money (2 comments)
  • Genuine sickie? (3 comments)
  • Nude teacher sacked (9 comments)
  • Judgement Day... (2 comments)
  • Time for a change (3 comments)
  • Team Tonics (4 comments)
  • Sarko the syco.. (6 comments)
  • Jung's Insights (1 comments)
  • Switch off (3 comments)
  • Couraud Cabaret! (1 comments)
  • Culture, Not Structure (0 comments)
  • Thinking outside the box
    Posted on 19 August 2008 by Dan O'Shea

    “Don’t put me in a box”

    This is without question the most common accusation levelled at personality profiling tools.

    But MBTI doesn’t tell you who you are: it indicates your preferences. A very important distinction.

    And whilst other personality tools attach complete importance to the online questionnaire you fill out and essentially say “this is your personality, Joe Bloggs, take it or leave it”, MBTI is far less prescriptive and recognises that the recipient is, ultimately, the best judge of who they are.

    So after filling out the questionnaire, you have a chat with a licensed practitioner who guides you through the tool and helps you identify your preferences by means of anecdotes, questions and gentle challenging. Then it’s down to you to decide where you sit.

     A good way of thinking outside the box with MBTI is to imagine your preferred personality style as your favourite room in a large house. You’re not locked into this room – you have the keys and can get up and wonder around the house whenever you like. It just so happens that the further away you get from your favourite room, the less familiar and comfortable you feel. But the more regularly you move around, the more at ease you become.

    The point being, we are all capable of turning our hand to all personality styles: it just comes down to which are natural and which can, with work, become second nature.

    5 comment(s) on this post     Show/Hide comments    Comment on this posting
    Jo said...
    Leave people in control and they won't complain.

    Just on Monday I contrasted the welcome people give to psychologist's reports (usually good) with the disdain they have for performance appraisal.

    http://flowingmotion.wordpress.com
    20/08/2008 16:06:00
    Darnell said...
    Another really important reason for the follow-up coaching session is to get to the bottom of something as knotty as introversion and extraversion. Because it's easy to assume that the popular definition of the 2 terms ( ie recluse vs socialite) is the same as the MBTI definition. But it's not. At all. So if you're deprived of that direction, you can walk away with a very skewed interpretation of what you 'prefer.' The facilitation is totally key
    19/08/2008 15:35:00
    Nick said...
    I agree absolutely with Lloydy. It's a helping hand - and then it's up to you. Some of it is about taking control and responsibility over who you are.
    19/08/2008 14:37:00
    Lloydy said...
    the individual vs team point is an important distinction to draw; I guess it depends if you want an instant hit for your team (that might be fun but not necessarily accurate)or something that is a slightly slower burner but will definitely linger (constructively) longer term. Id say MBTI slots into the 2nd camp. Some people get lazy and want consultants to cut to the chase and tell them what they are. But what's the point in that? Individuals need to meet them half way and recognise they are by no means passive bystanders in getting to grips with their own personality. They need to be ready to do some soul searching and self-reflection as that's the only way to get to true self-awareness
    19/08/2008 13:48:00
    steffo said...
    i like the room thing dan. mbti works pretty well for individuals but i am not sure about teams, i think there are better teams dynamics tools out there
    19/08/2008 12:04:00
    "360° Feedback For Managers - A Practical Guide": Get Your Free Copy Here